Home
/
Cryptocurrency news
/
Regulatory developments
/

Bank of america warns $6 trillion could shift to stablecoins

Banks Face $6 Trillion Exodus to Crypto | Deposits at Risk as Yields Lag Behind

By

Clara Robinson

Mar 30, 2026, 12:38 PM

Edited By

Anika Kruger

Updated

Mar 30, 2026, 06:44 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

Graphic showing Bank of America logo with comparison of interest rates between traditional banks and stablecoins like USDC
popular

A looming crisis in banking could see $6 trillion shift to stablecoins, Bank of Americaโ€™s CEO warns. With stagnant savings rates at Chase, financial experts and commenters alike highlight the urgent need for banks to rethink their strategies amid rising competition from crypto.

Stagnating Savings at Traditional Banks

Currently, Chase offers meager savings with a 0.01% APY, a stark contrast to crypto exchange offerings, where users can find yields of up to 5% on USDC. Many individuals are opting for alternative options, such as high-yield savings accounts (HYSAs), with reports indicating rates of about 3.5% to 3.7% from other banks, including Capital One.

โ€œAny interest that USD can earn, USDC can earn too,โ€ a user noted, pointing to the competitive nature of the current financial climate.

This shift is not just a trickle; the American Bankers Association estimates that the movement of funds into stablecoins could significantly reduce banks' lending capacity. If trends continue, banks may struggle to offer competitive rates or risk losing substantial deposits.

Regulatory Pressures Amplify Yield Gaps

Interestingly, the GENIUS Act signed in July 2025 restricts stablecoin issuers from paying interest, leaving a loophole for exchanges. This has heightened scrutiny on traditional banks and their savings strategies. Some commenters argue that customers do not realize they can find safer and higher yielding options rather than relying solely on banks. One user emphasized,

"Bank accounts arenโ€™t investment accounts. You can do better than that without exposing yourself to crypto risks."

The regulatory gap raises questions about the future of banking and how institutions might need to adapt to secure their clientele.

Mixed Reactions from the Community

Discussions around these shifts reveal a mix of sentiments:

  • Concerns Over Security: While higher yields attract attention, there are worries about the safety of funds in stablecoins compared to traditional banks.

  • Effectiveness of Higher Rates: Some commenters argue that banks can indeed pay better rates but choose not to. โ€œBanks could offer better yields; they just choose not to,โ€ one user remarked, reflecting frustration with traditional banking practices.

  • Alternative Options: Many users point out that avenues outside of traditional banking, like money market funds or buying bonds, provide more attractive returns without the volatility of cryptocurrencies.

Key Points to Remember

  • Yield Differences:

    โ–ธ Chase at 0.01% vs. up to 5% on USDC.

  • Potential Shift:

    โ–ธ Up to $6 trillion could move from banks to stablecoins.

  • Regulatory Loopholes:

    โ–ธ The GENIUS Act restricts interest for stablecoin issuers but not exchanges.

As the competition heats up, banks find themselves at a crossroads: modify their savings strategies or risk losing a substantial portion of their customer base to more appealing crypto alternatives. The next few years could redefine how people manage their money.