Home
/
Project reviews
/
DeFi projects
/

Why trusting banks over de fi is a risky gamble

Risky Business | Why Trusting Banks Over DeFi Can Be Dangerous

By

Aisha Patel

Nov 21, 2025, 07:38 PM

Edited By

Abdul Rahman

Updated

Nov 22, 2025, 09:38 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

A visual contrast between traditional banks and decentralized finance platforms, showing a bank building on one side and a digital interface representing DeFi on the other side, highlighting the differences in trust and transparency.

A growing number of people are pushing back against the notion that decentralized finance (DeFi) is too risky. Many cite the banks' role in the 2008 financial crisis as evidence that traditional institutions pose significant risks. This situation spurs a push for accountability and transparency in finance, sparking intense discussions.

The Stakes of Trusting Banks

Current discussions reveal deepening distrust of banks. Commenters emphasize that banks have long prioritized profit over responsibility. One community member stated, "When a bank has jurisdiction over your money, they can do whatever they want with it. When you have jurisdiction over your own money, you can do whatever you want with it." Another voiced anger over the dynamics of finance, noting, "Privatize profits, socialize losses. It’s the ultimate business model if you can get away with it."

"Don’t forget to mention all of the big wig CEOs resigning hours before the crash," pointed out another commentator, agreeing with the call for greater scrutiny of bank practices.

Perspectives on DeFi vs. Banking

Supporters of DeFi celebrate its transparency. They note that while scams are a concern, knowing the risks and understanding smart contracts enhances user control.

  • Control over Funds: Many point out the importance of financial autonomy. "DeFi lets me invest as a little investor, no intermediaries," one commenter highlighted.

  • Transparent Operations: A participant remarked, "DeFi shows you the code, shows you the risks; you choose what to do."

However, skepticism persists regarding DeFi's safety. "DeFi is extremely risky on Ethereum or any EVM. There's some major reentrancy attack every other day," a user warned, hinting that alternatives like Solana might be safer.

Sentiment Trends

Overall, the sentiment leans against traditional banks and is cautiously optimistic about DeFi. Participants believe that past failures of banks drive more people to consider decentralized alternatives. People's willingness to navigate the complexities of DeFi reflects a desire for improved financial control.

The Future of Financial Trust

As skepticism toward banks grows, experts believe DeFi adoption could climb significantly. An estimated 30% of transactions might shift to decentralized platforms by 2027. The push for transparency and autonomy in finance could lead to a substantial reorientation in how people engage with money, paving the way for innovations in DeFi.

Key Insights

  • 🚨 Skepticism of Banks: Many view banks as historically failing society.

  • πŸ” Awareness of Risks: There's recognition that both systems harbor risks.

  • πŸ’‘ Interest in DeFi: Growing exploration of DeFi as a serious alternative.

  • "Banks showed you gambled and society ate the loss," shared a participant, summarizing collective frustrations.

As these discussions continue to gain traction, the question lingers: can DeFi provide the safer, more transparent alternative people are seeking?