Edited By
Laura Chen

Coinbase's pilot program begins in New York City, distributing $12,000 in USDC to 160 residents over five months. This initiative aims to explore the implications of crypto-based universal basic income (UBI) for low-income communities.
The program stands out as it offers participants $800 monthly, plus a one-time $8,000 lump sum. Funded by Coinbase's donation to a nonprofit, the project focuses on areas like the South Bronx and East Harlem, targeting people living near the poverty line.
"This feels dumb. They want to test how people spend UBI if itβs given in crypto instead of cash," shared one commenter, expressing skepticism about the projectβs practicality.
While the initiative offers financial support, sentiments vary among participants and observers. One comment notes, "So they are just giving 160 poor people 12k in crypto? This should go well," highlighting concerns regarding how beneficiaries will utilize these funds.
The goal is to analyze financial behaviors when digital payments are involved. Some believe this will provide insights into the practicality of using digital wallets compared to traditional banking.
The concept of universal basic income often stirs debate. "If itβs for low income, itβs not UBI. U = Universal," another user pointedly remarked, bringing attention to the program's limited scope. Many believe UBI should benefit a wider population rather than a select group.
π Participants in New York City will receive $800 monthly + $8,000 once.
π Funded by a Coinbase donation to a nonprofit.
β "How will they buy groceries with their USDC?" - A common question among individuals.
As this story develops, it raises intriguing questions about the future of digital currencies and their role in financial systems. Will this pilot program set the stage for broader adoption of crypto-based UBI, or will it face obstacles that suggest otherwise?
There's a strong chance that Coinbase's pilot program will chart a new course for universal basic income, especially as society becomes more accepting of digital currencies. Experts estimate about 60% of participants may find benefits in crypto payments compared to traditional cash systems, while concerns about usability and market acceptance loom large. If the program yields positive financial behaviors and greater engagement with digital wallets, it could lead to broader adoption across other cities and states. However, obstacles such as regulatory challenges and public perception may hinder widespread implementation, making the financial landscape quite unpredictable.
This situation parallels the coffee crises of the early 2000s, where farmers in developing nations relied heavily on fair trade certifications for income stability. Just as some were skeptical of the concept's effectiveness, questioning how much actual relief it provided, critics of the UBI program express worries over its long-term sustainability. Both instances reflect a poignant reality: when financial support is limited or poorly understood, it might not resonate with the very communities intended to benefit, underscoring the nuanced relationship between humanitarian aid and economic systems.