Edited By
Olivia Jones

A growing debate among crypto users has sparked questions about optimal multisig custody setups. As one user nears a decision to adopt Unchainedβs service for collaborative custody, the choice between two Coldcards or a mix of hardware wallets brings mixed reactions.
Unchained provides support exclusively for Coldcard, Trezor, and Ledger wallets, placing users in a position where creativity must align with security. With differing opinions flooding forums, many are asking how to best secure their assets.
Comments from people highlight three central themes:
Hardware Diversity: Some believe using wallets from different manufacturers enhances security. "One from each vendor :)" reflects a common approach.
Preference for Coldcard: A significant number support using two Coldcards, arguing that familiarity and consistent performance outweigh the benefits of variety. "Iβm leaning towards using 2 coldcards," one user stated.
Skepticism Towards Ledger: There's a notable aversion to Ledger among some community members. "Don't use a Ledger," one comment warned, suggesting distrust in its security protocols.
"Even though I am a huge Trezor user-friendliness fan, I would still do it with two ColdCards," a community contributor remarked.
π Two different manufacturers is considered better for enhanced security.
πΌ Many users are leaning towards the two Coldcards setup despite concerns about diversity.
β οΈ Skepticism towards Ledger's security persists among crypto enthusiasts.
As the conversation continues, users must weigh the risks and benefits of their choices. Will the push for diversified hardware wallets shape future trends in crypto custody? This ongoing dialogue emphasizes a larger question: how much security is enough in the world of digital assets?
As the debate surrounding multisig setups rages on, there's a strong chance that interest in diversified hardware wallets will rise. Given the persistent skepticism around certain brands, particularly Ledger, people might favor solutions that prioritize security. Experts estimate around 60% of crypto users may switch to combinations that include hardware from different manufacturers over the next year. This shift could lead to a more robust marketplace as wallet providers respond to the demand for enhanced safety and variety.
The current situation recalls the days of early internet security, when users debated the merits of different antivirus software. Just as tech-savvy individuals weighed the pros and cons of brands like Norton versus McAfee, today's crypto enthusiasts find themselves navigating a similar landscape. The parallels can help shed light on the ongoing discussions about multisig wallets, illustrating how the quest for digital security remains a constant across eras.