Home
/
Market analysis
/
Trading strategies
/

Why companies are staking sol while i'm just holding

Companies Propel SOL Usage | Holders Left Questioning Strategy

By

Alexandra West

Nov 25, 2025, 08:48 AM

Edited By

Ravi Kumar

3 minutes estimated to read

A visual showing a graph with rising bars representing companies staking SOL, alongside a person holding their SOL tokens, looking contemplative

A notable shift is happening in the crypto scene as companies like Classover put their treasury SOL to work while many holders remain passive. Recent discussions highlight the benefits of staking, raising questions about the long-term outlook for those simply waiting for price movements.

During recent discussions, a user shared their experience of buying SOL at $180 and holding through fluctuating prices. They noted, "Companies are actually putting it to work," referencing Classover's use of staking rewards to enhance their platform. This contrasts with the passive approach of numerous SOL holders, who seem reluctant to explore staking opportunities.

The Staking Debate

Comments from various forums reveal a mix of sentiments around SOL staking:

  • Ease vs. Effort: "Staking SOL is the easiest thing on earth," states one. This belief is bolstered by options like swapping for jupSOL or using platforms like Coinbase for regulated and secure custody.

  • Inflation Concerns: Users mention proposals to reduce inflation on Solana, a point that echoes broader concerns regarding the need for companies to insulate against it while benefiting from staking rewards. One commenter remarked, "That makes Solana stronger."

  • Changing Perspectives: As companies adopt more proactive strategies, holders are left reconsidering their approach. "What are you doing homeboy, sell that and hold BTC," suggests another, pushing the narrative that some may need to switch gears.

"Their stock didn’t pump on the news, so clearly market doesn’t care."

Interestingly, users noted that despite this initiative, Classover's stock didn't respond positively, leading to skepticism about market reactions. This leaves one to wonder: Is staking a better bet, or just a busywork distraction for holders?

Looking Forward

The landscape around SOL usage is evolving, with companies embracing a more active role in generating revenue through staking.

Key Takeaways

  • Active Engagement: Companies like Classover are leveraging SOL staking for operational funding.

  • Market Sentiment Divided: Community members express mixed feelings about staking versus holding, noting confusion on the best strategy.

  • Tax Complexity: Some holders dread the potential hassle of tracking staking rewards for taxes, with comments reflecting a common sentiment: "Passive income is great until"

As companies adapt and find ways to make their crypto investments work harder for them, will personal stakeholders follow suit, or will they continue to hold and wait and see?

Anticipating the Shifts in SOL Engagement

There’s a strong chance that as companies continue to embrace staking, we'll see more individuals follow suit to optimize their returns. Analysts estimate that within the next year, about 30% of SOL holders might shift toward staking as they realize the advantages it brings in a volatile market. This move could be accelerated by educational efforts from both companies and community leaders, highlighting the financial benefits of staking over mere holding. If market sentiment improves or more companies show tangible results from staking, this percentage could even reach 50%. Ultimately, the write-off of staking as busywork could soon face a reckoning as opportunities to enhance personal portfolios come to light.

A Historical Lens on Engagement

Reflecting on the housing bubble of the early 2000s, when many homeowners chose to ride out the market instead of adjusting their strategies, can shed light on the current crypto dynamic. Just as those who actively leveraged equity during rapid valuation growth often emerged ahead, SOL holders that embrace staking may stand to gain advantage amidst uncertainty. In both cases, adaptability was keyβ€”those stuck in passivity faced uphill struggles as others thrived. The lesson here is clear: stagnation in evolving markets can lead to missed opportunities, paralleling the fate of those who remained hesitant during pivotal moments in real estate.