Home
/
Project reviews
/
Stablecoins analysis
/

Why criminals keep turning to stablecoins despite risks

Why Criminals Turn to Stablecoins | Risks and Rewards in the Trade

By

Emilia Zhang

Mar 6, 2026, 10:55 AM

Edited By

Sophie Chang

Updated

Mar 7, 2026, 09:30 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

A representation of stablecoins like Tether and Circle being used in illicit transactions, with visual elements indicating risk and scrutiny, like caution symbols and wallet freezes.

A notable surge in criminal activity linked to stablecoins like Tether and Circle raises concerns. Despite the risk of wallet freezes and heightened regulatory scrutiny, these digital currencies are gaining traction due to their speed, liquidity, and potential for large transfers without declaration to tax authorities.

Wallet Freezes Don't Deter Use

Tether has frozen over $4 billion in assets, yet this doesn’t faze many criminals. As pointed out on forums, "they don’t have to be stable; they just need to work." This underscores a widespread understanding that stablecoins serve their basic purpose well.

Commenters highlight the ease of using stablecoins, with one noting, "It’s easy. I’m pretty sure that was the entire purpose of creating them." Despite the freezing measures, many still see these currencies as the best option for their operations.

Quick Transfers Make a Big Difference

Speed continues to be a deciding factor. Participants emphasize, "Because you can transfer $100 million anywhere faster." This capability allows criminals to swiftly move large amounts, escaping the radar before authorities can act. It's this rapid transfer feature that remains crucial for those looking to evade law enforcement.

Stability Still Matters, but Alternatives Exist

Stablecoins provide less volatility compared to Bitcoin, although some users argue their necessity may not stem from stability alone. The sentiment on forums suggests a blend of pressure and expectation drives this choice. "Because in most countries, you don’t have to declare your crypto to the tax authorities," reveals a prevalent rationale that complicates regulatory efforts.

"Criminals will use whatever they can," reflects a sense of resilience among those involved in these operations. Alternatives like Monero are also gaining attention for their privacy features, although the primary draw remains on stablecoins for more immediate transactions.

Closing Insights

  • πŸš€ Speed is Crucial: Stablecoins enable instant transfers, essential for illicit activities.

  • πŸ’Έ Easy Access: Rapid liquidity keeps operations smooth for those determined to sidestep regulators.

  • πŸ“ˆ Less Volatile: Stablecoins are often seen as a safer bet in uncertain financial climates, but their stability is increasingly being questioned.

As digital currency regulation intensifies, authorities face hard questions.

What strategies will they adopt to mitigate the growing use of stablecoins among criminal entities? The landscape is shifting rapidly, and the need for updated frameworks becomes more pressing with each passing day.

What Lies Ahead?

Regulatory bodies are expected to ramp up scrutiny on stablecoins in upcoming years. Solutions like enhanced tracking mechanisms may be developed to better target illicit transactions, as experts project that around 60% of law enforcement agencies might embrace new technologies by 2028. The discourse surrounding digital currency regulation suggests more stringent laws could emerge, further limiting the role of stablecoins in illegal operations.

The journey reflects a historic parallel; much like the underground economies of yesteryear relied on cash for quick exchanges, today's criminals find value and efficacy in stablecoins, adapting their methods as restrictions evolve.