Edited By
Olivia Murphy

A growing chorus of people is questioning why Cold Card continues to hold onto personal email addresses long after purchases. This has sparked discussions around data privacy among those who bought the hardware wallet years ago. Recent communications from Cold Card have raised eyebrows, leading to calls for clearer data management practices.
The situation emerged after a recent customer shared their surprise at receiving emails from Cold Card four years after their purchase. They wondered if the company has a data deletion policy similar to that of Trezor, which is known to remove data following GDPR guidelines in the EU.
The feedback on various forums is mixed:
Thereβs a strong chance that Cold Card will face increased pressure to refine its data retention policies in response to growing public concern. With privacy regulations evolving, especially in the U.S. under the current administration, experts estimate that companies like Cold Card that lack transparency may soon find themselves compelled to comply with stricter standards, possibly reflecting the practices of European counterparts. As more customers express anxiety over data security, Cold Card may accelerate efforts to establish clearer communication about their data management processes, aiming to restore trust in their brand.
Looking back, the situation mirrors how the tobacco industry faced scrutiny over health concerns decades ago. Just as nicotine companies were once seen as unaccountable, holding onto secrets longer than they should have, tech firms safeguarding data without clear policies may find themselves in similar hot water. The call for accountability in both cases stems from a rising awareness among people, urging companies to prioritize trustworthiness over profit. This parallel reminds us that in our digital age, transparency is not just an option but a mandate for survival.