Edited By
Kevin Holt

A growing number of people are expressing frustration over the current AMP missions in the monthly ladder. Users argue these challenges are unrealistic with insufficient options available, impacting the ability to complete month-end goals.
AMP missions have gained a noteworthy amount of criticism recently. Many feel these challenges are unnecessarily tied to local campaigns, making them difficult to achieve for broader audiences. According to feedback from various forums, several people say the lack of reasonable options in their areas leaves them feeling stuck.
"There's a city-specific one that you have to buy a city one for it's still very manageable, though," notes one commenter, highlighting the mixed feelings toward these tasks.
Responses from the community indicate differing levels of acceptance.
Frustration: Many feel AMP challenges are overly restrictive and detrimental to completing monthly tasks.
Complacency: Others have completed ladders despite AMP hurdles, stating it's just one of ten challenges.
Doubts on Credit: A number of reports of failed credits after completing AMP tasks add to the skepticism.
"I ordered something for $1 never got credit for so now I'm skeptical for even trying again," shares another frustrated individual. This sentiment resonates with many, as users share their own unsuccessful attempts with AMP challenges.
Interestingly, some commenters from outside the U.S. argue that they face fewer challenges overall. "Instead of fixing the issue, by removing the AMP task from the international challenge ladder, they just hide it," one user critiques, hinting at a broader issue of unequal treatment among global participants.
๐ซ Many users feel that local AMP missions negatively impact month-end goal completion.
โ Some users claim they have no problem completing the ladder despite the challenges.
๐ฌ Mixed feelings about the effectiveness of AMP campaigns in various regions persist.
The conversation remains lively, and as February continues, participants are left questioning if changes will be made to address these concerns. Will future updates consider user feedback?
Thereโs a strong chance that AMP missions will undergo significant revisions as dissatisfaction grows. With many expressing that current requirements hinder their goal completion, user feedback may compel the organizers to reassess these missions. Officials may introduce broader challenges or more accessible options to accommodate a diverse range of locations and participants. Experts estimate that changes could roll out by mid-2026, aiming to enhance user participation and satisfaction. As conversations continue to heat up in forums, the decision-makers may be more inclined to listen to the community than in previous months.
This situation bears resemblance to early smartphone app launches where initial user feedback led to unexpected tweaks in functionality. Just as many app developers initially struggled to tune their offerings based on user habits, those managing AMP missions might find themselves in a similar position. The rapid adjustments in app ecosystems often stemmed from the need for more inclusive features, mirroring the call for AMP enhancements today. This parallel highlights the constant evolution within tech products driven by peopleโs voices, showcasing how challenging experiences can ultimately lead to better, more user-friendly outcomes.