Home
/
Market analysis
/
Price trends
/

Hbar's design: why it won't skyrocket in price

HBAR's Design | Price Path Remains a Hot Topic

By

Michael Chen

Feb 15, 2026, 04:13 PM

Edited By

Anika Kruger

Updated

Feb 15, 2026, 10:00 PM

2 minutes estimated to read

A visual representation showing the stable framework of HBAR designed for corporations with low fees and predictable governance.
popular

A lively debate continues around HBAR's price potential, with some arguing its structure limits sharp increases. Recent comments from users reinforce concerns that Hedera's focus on stability over volatility may affect its long-term growth and investor appeal.

New Insights from Users

Recent discussions reveal significant insights. One user pointed out that Leemon, a key figure in the ecosystem, mentioned plans for companies to hold a treasury of HBAR. This strategy would allow businesses to regularly access HBAR at fixed rates, lowering price risk while building a sustainable revenue model.

"Companies popping up will hold HBAR and provide this daily sale to enterprises, which can reduce price risk," a comment summarized.

The Stable Price Debate

The core of the discourse centers on whether HBAR's design inherently leads to stagnation:

  1. Prioritizing Corporate Needs: Users have reiterated that HBAR is specifically engineered for enterprises, emphasizing predictable fees and legal structures instead of market fluctuations.

  2. Predictable Costs: Many noted the fixed fee model in USD, stating that it ensures costs remain stable regardless of HBARโ€™s market value.

  3. Perception of Value: Some skeptics continue to question if such a stable approach could discourage broader adoption and investment in HBAR. As one user quipped, "Itโ€™s designed so the price level does not affect adopters in the slightest."

The Community's Mixed Sentiment

While many see stability as a necessary strength, others voice concerns about potential stagnation:

"Enterprises want to know how much they will pay every month, but does this deter tech-savvy investors?"

The discussions hint at a critical tension between maintaining steady growth for corporate clients and attracting speculative investment. As the debate unfolds, many users remain focused on how HBAR's approach can impact its standing in the larger crypto market.

Notable Takeaways

  • ๐ŸŒ Treasury Model Emerging: Plans for holding HBAR in treasuries could stabilize pricing for enterprises.

  • ๐Ÿ’ต Reliability Over Volatility: Hedera's model values cost predictability, catering primarily to business clients.

  • โš–๏ธ Investor Concerns: This model may discourage engagement from speculative investors, raising questions about potential growth.

As discussions swirl, can Hedera strike the right balance between serving enterprises and appealing to investors? The path ahead for HBAR appears to hinge on addressing these divergent needs.