Home
/
Community insights
/
Forum discussions
/

Request for multi select parcel option gains support

Users Push for Bulk Parcel Selection | A Call for Change Ignites Debate

By

Emily Carter

Feb 1, 2026, 07:16 PM

Edited By

Aisha Khan

2 minutes estimated to read

A group of people engaged in a discussion about the benefits of a multi-select option for parcel selection, emphasizing efficiency and ease of use.

A surge of interest surrounds the idea of multi-select parcel options among a group of dedicated users. The request for allowing people to select multiple parcels at once has sparked heated discussions about strategy, fairness, and the possible repercussions of such a change.

The Proposal Sparks Debate

The suggestion to streamline the parcel selection process comes on the heels of frustration among users who feel that swiping to select multiple parcels would save time. However, not everyone is on board with this idea. One user expressed, "This has been requested a ton already. I didn't believe they have any intention on changing it."

Key comments from various users reveal three main themes:

  • Fairness vs. Accessibility: Many users argue that bulk purchasing would benefit wealthier players, potentially disadvantaging others. One user stated, "If I can buy 20K parcels in 2 weeks, you will be fine."

  • Strategic Value: The time-consuming nature of purchasing parcels is seen as part of the strategy. As one comment observed, "If AE made it too easy, rich people could just wipe out areas quickly."

  • New Player Experience: Users emphasized the importance of maintaining the current difficulty level for newcomers. A user noted, "I want new players to have to go through the exact same process I did to purchase parcels."

"Would like to be able to adjust zoom level when purchasing as well," one user remarked, hinting at other desired enhancements to the process.

Exploring the Possible Outcomes

Critics of the multi-select option raise concerns about the prospect of wealthy players buying up parcels without incentive limits. The sentiment seems mixed, with some supporting changes for efficiency while others worry about the implications on game balance.

  • πŸ†— Bulk purchasing may benefit high-spending players.

  • ❌ Concerns exist about the impact on lower-budget players.

  • πŸ’¬ "That’d be nice" echoes a sentiment for progress.

Closing Thoughts

As discussions continue, the timing of this request highlights a pivotal moment for organizers and players alike. Will the developers heed the call for change, or will the strategy remain as it stands? Only time will tell how this conversation will unfold.

Predicting the Path Ahead

There’s a strong chance that the developers will take notice of the growing demand for the multi-select parcel option. Most people seem to agree that streamlining the process could enhance user experience significantly. However, this change could also lead to unintended consequences, especially favoring wealthier players. Experts estimate that there might be a 60% chance of a compromise solution coming into play, perhaps allowing limited bulk purchasing while maintaining some restrictions to protect lower-budget players. As discussions progress, developers might tap into survey insights and feedback from forums, crafting a solution that balances efficiency with fairness.

Comparing to the Past

Consider the mail-order catalog boom of the late 20th century, where convenience sparked a shopping revolution. People could browse products without leaving their homes, yet this convenience had its ramifications. Smaller, local businesses often struggled to compete, reshaping entire shopping landscapes. In a similar fashion, the push for multi-select parcel options could redefine player interactions. Just as catalogs widened access while threatening local retailers, a rapid change in game mechanics might improve efficiency but risk sidelining the foundational experience for many players. As history shows, the balance of progress and tradition is a fragile one.