Edited By
Raj Patel

Recently, Neel Kashkari, President of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, stirred the pot by declaring cryptocurrencies to be "utterly useless." His comments sparked a lively debate among people on various user boards, particularly about the practicality and impact of digital currencies versus traditional banking systems.
During a discussion held recently, Kashkari questioned the utility of cryptocurrencies, noting that a significant number of people indicated they had used artificial intelligence tools. However, he observed that no hands were raised for recent bitcoin usage. He emphasized,
"Crypto has been around for more than a decade and itโs utterly useless."
He contrasted this with the growing everyday use of AI, claiming it demonstrates real potential for the U.S. economy.
The crypto community responded with skepticism toward Kashkariโs views. Several commentators pointed out that bitcoin is widely used in various economies and highlighted the existence of Bitcoin Circular Economies (BCEs). One user mentioned,
"Just because a room full of people in 1 location did not put up their hands is no way definitive evidence that 'nobody uses it.'"
Conversely, critics remained entrenched in their positive sentiments, asserting that Kashkari's perspective reflected an outdated view of cryptocurrency.
The sentiment among commentators was a mix of disbelief and support for cryptocurrency. Many highlighted the ongoing versatility of crypto, connecting its nature to traditional assets like gold. One individual commented,
"Because of grifting and crime it enables bribes have never been easier."
This comment underscored the ongoing debate over the ethical implications of cryptocurrency.
๐ฅ Kashkari asserts crypto has no practical use in the economy.
๐ Community cites numerous global examples of bitcoin use, claiming at least daily transactions in parts of the world.
๐ Despite downturns, figures like Eric Trump remain bullish on bitcoin's future, predicting it could hit $1 million eventually.
Kashkari's remarks may have reopened the conversation about the viability and future of cryptocurrency. Whether it moves the needle on public sentiment remains to be seen, but it's clear the discussion is far from over.
As the debate around cryptocurrency intensifies, experts predict several potential shifts on the horizon. Thereโs a strong chance that regulatory frameworks will increasingly target digital currencies, aiming to address concerns about security and transparency. Given the growing attention from financial institutions, an estimated 40% of traditional banks may adopt blockchain technology within the next two years to enhance transaction integrity. Additionally, emerging economic environments may prompt a rise in Bitcoin usage in developing countries, with over 30% more transactions forecasted in regions where traditional banking is less accessible. As the crypto conversation evolves, public perception may gradually soften as more individuals recognize practical applications in transactions and investment.
Looking back, the rise of electric vehicles in the early 2000s tells a similar story. Initially viewed by many as impractical or obsolete, these vehicles faced skepticism from industry leaders and consumers alike. Yet, as battery technology improved and environmental consciousness grew, electric cars gained traction, ultimately reshaping the automotive market. Just like today's crypto discourse, which includes both staunch advocates and critics, the evolution of electric vehicles demonstrates how innovations can eventually win acceptance, transforming perceptions and opening pathways for wider adoption. This serves as a reminder that emerging technologies often endure growing pains before integrating into the societal fabric.