Home
/
Cryptocurrency news
/
Regulatory developments
/

Power struggle over america's currency: old vs new

Power Struggle in America's Monetary Future | Crypto vs. Traditional Finance

By

Isabella Torres

Nov 22, 2025, 11:49 PM

Edited By

Fatima Khan

3 minutes estimated to read

Symbolic clash between traditional financial institutions and digital currency represented by Bitcoin.

A fierce battle is underway over who will control the future of currency in the U.S. On one side, traditional giants like JPMorgan and the Federal Reserve stand firm, while the Trump administration seeks to innovate with digital dollars backed by Bitcoin.

The Conflict Unveiled

At the center of this conflict is the effort by the current administration to reclaim monetary control by issuing stablecoins, countering decades of profit made by the established financial system. This struggle is not just about technology; itโ€™s about redefining the financial landscape.

Why Bitcoin Matters

Bitcoin has emerged as a critical player in this financial tug-of-war. Sources suggest that the old guard is employing strategies such as fake contracts and short-selling to keep Bitcoin's price low, while the new wave focuses on stocking up on it before launching their full plans.

"The dollar is the establishment, and crypto like Bitcoin is a move for power," commented a user board contributor.

MicroStrategyโ€™s Role

MicroStrategy finds itself at the center of this financial free-for-all, serving as a gateway for institutional Bitcoin investment. It has become a target for the traditional banking factions who see it as a bridge that needs to be destroyed. The implications of this are enormous, potentially reshaping financial influence for years.

The Next Few Years

Observers suggest the outcomes of this power struggle could determine whether we continue under the current financial regime established between 1971 and 2024, or shift toward a new paradigm driven by digital currency.

Sentiment and Responses

The reactions on user boards show a mix of skepticism and intrigue toward the administration's plans:

  • "Nobody believes Trump is anti-establishment," noted one commenter, questioning the actual intent behind the push for crypto.

  • Conversely, another user argued, "This is how you seize power."

  • Some cynically referred to the developments as reaching the "conspiracy stage."

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿš€ New digital dollars proposed to challenge traditional currency

  • โšก Traditional banks reportedly suppressing Bitcoin's value

  • ๐Ÿ’ก MicroStrategy seen as vital for institutional Bitcoin access

As the battle wages on, the next 1-3 years will be pivotal in determining the future of how money is controlled and utilized in America. Will traditional systems continue their dominance, or will a paradigm shift arise with new innovations in digital currency?

Predictions on the Horizon

Looking ahead, thereโ€™s a strong chance that the push for digital dollars will intensify within the next few years. With the Trump administration's backing, stakeholders may successfully launch a regulatory framework for stablecoins, likely commanding a notable share of the market by 2027. Analysts estimate a 60% probability that this new digital currency will gain traction among both investors and the general public. However, traditional financial institutions are unlikely to back down without a fight, deploying further tactics to maintain their stronghold, which suggests the possibility of an escalating battle in congressional hearings and in financial markets alike.

Echoes from Financial History

The current struggle for monetary control echoes the 19th-century banking wars in the U.S. when the introduction of the National Bank System faced fierce resistance from state banks. Just like today, the fight centered on who would regulate the creation of currency and control its value. This period saw states rally against the federal system, creating diverse approaches to currency that sometimes weakened the dollar's overall stability, a scenario that mirrors the emerging conflict between cryptocurrencies and traditional finance. The stakes are high now, as they were back then, suggesting that the outcome could reshape Americaโ€™s financial infrastructure for generations to come.