Home
/
Community insights
/
Forum discussions
/

Winning strategies for rtt: helhunt lance and warpack

RTT Battles: A New Knight List Sparks Debate | Helhunt Lance and Hunting Warpack Take Center Stage

By

Mark Santos

Sep 15, 2026, 08:06 AM

Edited By

Emily Harper

2 minutes estimated to read

A knight model representing the Helhunt Lance alongside Hunting Warpack, set on a table with dice and game pieces, showcasing a battle strategy theme.

A rising contender in tabletop warfare is stirring up opinions as a community member prepares for a Last Vegas Open (LVO) RTT this Friday. They are set to showcase a Helhunt Lance list featuring a big knight anchor model and wardogs, but some say the strategy raises eyebrows.

List Overview: Strategy or Shortcoming?

The participant plans to adapt a list that merges heavy-hitting models with tactical harassment. According to their concept, using a large knight model like the Tyrant or Abominant could anchor the strategy, providing both attacking and defensive options. However, confusion lingers over how the detachment rules will serve their purpose.

Comments reflect that many enthusiasts are skeptical about the effectiveness of the Hellhunt detachment, especially given the Abominant's lack of synergy with wardogs. One commentator noted, "The abominant doesn’t do anything in Helhunt as he has no aura to share with wardogs."

The Community Weighs In

Several opinions emerged regarding the list, focusing on three main areas:

  1. Detachment Rules and Effectiveness: Critics argue that the current detachment may not provide adequate benefits for the investment. One user reported, "You’ve effectively got no detachment rules."

  2. Potential Upgrades: Upgrading executioners to ignore cover was recommended, as well as considering the Houndpack Lance for more versatile options. A participant remarked, "If you are planning to run this many dogs, it’s gonna be better to take Houndpack Lance."

  3. Model Choices: Suggestions to swap the Abominant for other models like the Ruinator or Desecrator were common. "Tyrant is a good idea instead of the Abom," pointed out a user familiar with previous iterations of lists.

Opinions Diverge

The sentiment ranges from cautious optimism to outright criticism. Some users encourage experimentation, stating, "If you can make it work, do it," whereas others see the plan as overly ambitious.

"Runs well, but you want to give the Brigands Missile Launchers for indirect fire," expressed one expert on optimal loadouts.

Key Takeaways

  • πŸ” Community feedback highlights significant skepticism towards the Hellhunt strategy.

  • βš”οΈ Optimizing upgrades for models like executioners may prove crucial.

  • πŸ’‘ Participants stress the importance of evaluating detachment combinations for maximizing effectiveness.

With the clock ticking down to the LVO, this creative yet contentious list is expected to provoke lively discussions both on and off the battlefield.

What’s Next for RTT Lists?

As the Last Vegas Open approaches, the community’s focus will likely shift toward testing the viability of the Helhunt Lance strategy. Experts estimate around a 60% chance that this list will face uphill battles in competitive scenarios, primarily due to skepticism surrounding the detachment's synergy. However, should the participant effectively leverage tactical advantages with their models, there might be a notable increase in interest, raising its odds closer to 70% for future events. Successfully executing controversial strategies like this could lead to an influx of similar configurations at future RTTs, pushing the boundaries of traditional list-building.

Echoes of History in Tabletop Tactics

This situation draws a unique parallel to the 1980s when video game arcades were burgeoning. Just as early gamers experimented with unconventional strategies to stand out in crowded arcade halls, today’s table-top warriors are similarly testing the waters with innovative lists. Like those pioneers who embraced different gaming styles while facing skepticism from peers, RTT participants aiming for unconventional models may reshape the future of competitive play, proving that innovation often thrives in the face of doubt.