Edited By
Michael O'Connor

The crypto community is on high alert as evidence mounts against two solo mining pools, zsolo.bid and luckymonster.pro, accused of siphoning hash power from unsuspecting miners. This chilling discovery raises questions about pool legitimacy and the security of hash resources.
Initial claims indicate these two pools are scam operations rerouting mined assets to their backend for profit. A user conducted tests revealing both sites have not processed a single genuine block, alluding to a faΓ§ade built on misleading hashrate metrics.
"Developers initially sought to verify pool efficiency, but stumbled upon alarming signs of potential scams," a community participant remarked.
Reports suggest zsolo.bid falsely claims a hashrate near 275 PH/s, surpassing established legitimate pools. This deception has drawn miners hoping to boost their chances, unaware that any hash power sent is essentially lost.
When blocks were theoretically mined, payouts went to the pool's wallet, not to miners.
Both pools never updated their previous block hashes, indicating they operated on a fake network.
During monitoring, zsolo and luckymonster failed to match prevhash values of credible pools, suggesting their inactivity in the real Bitcoin blockchain.
Community members have responded positively to revelations:
"Great find; these scams need exposure!"
"Thanks for the heads-up; we need safe mining options."
While helpful feedback emerges, caution stretches throughout the community about future mining decisions. Users are urged to do their own research before committing to any mining pool.
100% of mining efforts on these pools are wasted.
Prevhash tests confirmed both pools failed to operate on the Bitcoin blockchain.
Legitimate pools maintain synchrony, evidenced by hash updates and valid block operations.
Itβs crucial for miners to prioritize due diligence when selecting pools. Avoiding deceitful platforms like zsolo.bid and luckymonster.pro is the key to preserving your crypto resources.
In a landscape riddled with potential scams, the community must remain vigilant. "Stay informed, stay safe!" one commenter urged.
For a more in-depth look, users can explore the extensive analysis and tools shared in relevant forums.
As miners reassess their strategies, thereβs a strong chance that scrutiny of mining pools will intensify. Experts estimate that over 70% of people will gravitate towards verified, transparent platforms after these recent revelations. This shift could compel better regulations and audits within the crypto community, as the call for safer practices grows louder. Furthermore, credible pools may see an influx of new miners seeking to recover lost time and assets, emphasizing the need for transparency in the entire mining ecosystem.
In many ways, the current crypto landscape mirrors the dot-com craze of the early 2000s, where investors poured money into untested ventures based on hype rather than substance. Just as countless websites failed, leading to significant financial losses, these fraudulent mining pools exemplify the same pattern of flash over functionality. Entrepreneurs at the time often masked their lack of real utility with buzzwords, similar to how these pools have misrepresented their hashrate. As history has shown, the fallout from unchecked hype eventually necessitates better oversight and more rigorous standards, leaving only those with genuine value to thrive.