Home
/
Community insights
/
Forum discussions
/

Scammers use $8 blue check to trick followers, steal $500 k

Scammers Exploit Blue Check Verification | $500K Ransacked from Twitter Users

By

Emily Wong

Feb 20, 2026, 07:25 PM

Edited By

Maria Silva

3 minutes estimated to read

A person using a smartphone with a blue checkmark on the screen, representing social media impersonation, while money is shown in the background indicating a scam
popular

A bizarre scam involving a fake Twitter account has shocked many as scammers masquerading as Epstein's ex-girlfriend, Karyna Shuliak, scammed users out of $500,000. This incident highlights the vulnerabilities within social media platforms, leaving many to wonder how such a blatant hoax was able to deceive so many.

The Setup

The scammers purchased an old Twitter account from 2017, renamed it to Karyna Shuliak, and paid $8 for the blue verification check. With a faΓ§ade of legitimacy, they began posting outrageous conspiracy theories and teased "leaks" that sparked interest. They tagged influential users and drew significant attention, causing the account to appear credible.

The plot thickened when a suggestion came to launch a Solana coin where all funds would support victims. "Donate it to the real victims," the fake account urged, prompting a rush of donations from users eager to contribute to a supposed whistleblower.

Social Media Influence

This incident exposes a worrying trend in social media behavior. With comments noting that "50% of people and 90% of Twitter users believed it," the power of a blue check verification proved overwhelming. As one user put it, "Social media facilitates idiots gathering together, so this is no surprise." Many were caught in the frenzy, demonstrating the dangerous mix of trust and social proof online.

In less than 24 hours, the scammers reportedly walked away with around $350,000 before revealing it was all a "social experiment." The reaction on Twitter varied, with some claiming deserved karma for those who fell for the scheme.

Key Takeaways

  • β–³ Scammers used an old account, blue check, and conspiracy theories to deceive.

  • β–½ Donations surged for a false cause, showing poor vigilance among people.

  • β€» "A fool and his money are soon parted" - A reflection echoed in many comments.

Ending

As this scandal unfolds, it begs the question: How can people better protect themselves against such scams? Given the rapid spread of misinformation online, users need to be more discerning about the accounts they trust and the information they act upon. Twitter's verification system may need a more robust approach to prevent future hoaxes.

Whether this event marks a turning point in how platforms enforce legitimacy or simply an anomaly in the ongoing saga of online deceit remains to be seen.

Future Scam Trends Ahead

There's a strong chance that scams like this one will become more frequent as social media continues to evolve. Experts estimate that the increase in verified accounts will likely give rise to more impersonation schemes. With current security measures lacking, people may lose faith in verification systems, making it easier for scammers to exploit trust. As platforms enhance their verification processes, we might also see a push for more accountability from social media companies to help mitigate these threats. Without strategic improvements, the potential for further scams looms large, particularly in this era where misinformation spreads rapidly.

Echoes of History in Digital Deceit

Consider the era of the tulip mania in 17th-century Holland. Just as tulip bulbs became a currency of status and wealth, the blue check on Twitter now stands as a mark of credibility, often mixed with greed and naΓ―vetΓ©. People invested heavily, chasing perceived value rather than actual worth. This incident reflects that age-old impulse, where allure and status can cloud judgment. The tulip craze ultimately burst, leading to widespread financial ruin, mirroring how today's scams can unravel the trust built through social validationβ€”reminding us that human behavior, despite advances in technology, frequently falls into familiar traps.