Home
/
Project reviews
/
Stablecoins analysis
/

S&p downgrades tether stablecoin rating to 'weak'

S&P Cuts Tether Stablecoin Rating to 'Weak' | Disclosure Gaps Raise Concerns

By

Michael Chen

Nov 27, 2025, 01:17 AM

Edited By

Anika Kruger

2 minutes estimated to read

Illustration of Tether's logo with a downward arrow symbolizing its new 'weak' rating by S&P, highlighting concerns about its stability and transparency in the cryptocurrency market.
top

Tether has faced scrutiny as S&P downgraded its token, USDT, to a '5 (weak)' from '4 (constrained)', marking the lowest score possible. The report highlights significant disclosure gaps, drawing a sharp rebuttal from Tether, which claimed it "strongly disagrees with the characterization."

Controversy Brews Over Rating

The decision to lower Tether’s rating has sparked outcry among people in the crypto community. Many are voicing concerns about the integrity of the stablecoin, especially in light of reports suggesting Tether may have questionable financial practices. Comments reflecting skepticism include one that stated, "Everyone knows they are printing hundreds of billions of counterfeit dollars."

Insider Perspectives

Several users on forums discussed Tether's impact on the broader crypto market:

  • β€œThey’ve been running this racket for, what, 10 years and haven’t been caught yet?”

  • β€œUltimately this doesn’t matter at all. I mean, where else is crypto going to turn for β€˜liquidity’?”

A notable observation remarked, β€œIf you had told someone we’d be managing national debt with Tether, they would have laughed.” This sentiment underscores a growing discontent with the traditional financial systems leveraging unstable crypto assets for stability.

Heightened Risk in the Crypto Space

Experts worry that Tether’s financial maneuvers could trigger a systemic risk in the crypto market. One commenter pointed out,

"Even if one stablecoin is considered more reliable than Tether, Tether can destabilize that by doing massive swaps."

This highlights the fragility of the crypto space that has come to rely heavily on Tether.

Key Observations

  • β–³ S&P's downgrade reflects the lowest rating for Tether, raising alarms.

  • β–½ Tether's response claims disagreement with the report's findings.

  • β€» "This sets dangerous precedent" suggests a growing fear of stability issues in the market.

Despite Tether's claim of maintaining "notable price stability" during market turbulence, responses indicate a mix of cynicism and skepticism regarding its operations.

As the crypto landscape evolves, the implications of Tether’s rating downgrade may resonate much deeper, prompting regulatory scrutiny and a reassessment of stablecoins by investors and regulators alike.

Impending Changes in the Crypto Sphere

With Tether's downgrade lighting up discussions, experts believe a shakeup in the stablecoin market is imminent. There's a strong chance that regulators will step in to address the increasing concerns about transparency and stability. Given the heightened scrutiny on Tether, it's estimated that other stablecoins may also face evaluations as a result, pushing for stricter compliance standards. As people look for safer alternatives, we could see a shift in investments away from Tether, increasing the demand for stablecoins aligned with regulatory frameworks. This scenario might push Tether into reevaluating its financial practices, aiming for a more transparent operation to regain trust in a skeptical marketplace.

A Historical Echo from the Savings and Loan Crisis

This current valuation turmoil recalls the Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s, where poor asset management and insufficient oversight in a key financial sector led to widespread collapse. Just as that crisis revealed critical vulnerabilities within the banking system, the issues surrounding Tether could lead to a broader examination of the crypto ecosystem, underscoring the necessity for healthy market practices. The parallel is striking: both situations involved a stark lack of transparency, inciting significant regulatory responses that ultimately shaped the landscapes of their respective financial environments.